Investment Data Table

Analyze 9,861 laundromat opportunities in spreadsheet format

Card View Data Table
-
-
Showing 50 of 9,861 results Page 153 of 198
Opp Score ↑ Location State ZIP Rating Reviews Traffic Market Position Predicted Tier Claimed Verified Area Indicators
60 Mishawaka IN 3.7 94 - Average - ✗ ✗
60 New Haven CT 4.2 194 - Established - ✗ ✗
60 Orlando FL 3.7 94 - Average - ✗ ✗
60 Seattle WA 3.4 34 - Struggling - ✗ ✗
60 Vancouver WA 3.9 134 - Average - ✗ ✗
60 Columbia MD 4.2 194 - Established - ✗ ✗
60 Minneapolis MN 3.7 94 - Average - ✗ ✗
60 Dayton OH 3.9 134 - Average - ✗ ✗
60 Youngstown OH 3.3 14 - Weak - ✗ ✗
60 Reno NV 3.6 74 - Average - ✗ ✗
60 Hoover AL 3.5 54 - Average - ✗ ✗
60 Gallup NM 4.0 154 - Established - ✗ ✗
60 Jefferson City MO 4.1 174 - Established - ✗ ✗
60 Winder GA 30680 4.2 194 - Established - ✗ ✗
60 St. Louis MO 63113.0 3.9 134 - Average - ✗ ✗
60 Keenesburg CO 80643 3.3 14 - Weak - ✗ ✗
60 Brooklyn NY 11223 3.5 0 5,407 Unproven - ✗ ✗
61 Scranton PA 3.7 95 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Columbia SC 3.4 35 - Struggling - ✗ ✗
61 Topeka KS 4.0 155 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Lexington KY 3.8 115 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Tulsa OK 4.2 195 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Lynn MA 4.1 175 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Dayton OH 3.6 75 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Cuyahoga Falls OH 4.0 155 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Euclid OH 3.6 75 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Montgomery AL 4.1 175 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Gastonia NC 3.7 95 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Provo UT 4.2 195 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Hoover AL 3.5 55 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Anchorage AK 3.6 75 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Waukegan IL 3.8 116 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Oakland CA 3.3 16 - Weak - ✗ ✗
61 Leawood KS 4.2 196 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Augusta GA 4.2 196 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Lawton OK 3.5 56 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Macon GA 3.4 36 - Struggling - ✗ ✗
61 Logan UT 84321.0 4.2 196 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Vancouver WA 3.6 76 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Los Angeles CA 90018 4.2 196 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Cincinnati OH 4.2 196 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Cincinnati OH 3.5 56 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Hamilton OH 4.2 196 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 La Crosse WI 3.4 36 - Struggling - ✗ ✗
61 Greensboro NC 3.3 16 - Weak - ✗ ✗
61 Sioux Falls SD 3.9 136 - Average - ✗ ✗
61 Provo UT 4.0 156 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Iowa City IA 4.0 156 - Established - ✗ ✗
61 Decatur IL 3.4 37 - Struggling - ✗ ✗
61 Fort Wayne IN 3.4 37 - Struggling - ✗ ✗
Login to export data

Understanding the Data

Opportunity Score

Higher scores indicate better acquisition potential based on ratings, claim status, traffic, and market positioning.

Market Position

Calculated from review count and rating. "Struggling" businesses have many reviews but low ratings.

Area Indicators

P=Pawnbrokers, C=Check Cashing, D=Dollar Stores, G=Gas Stations. Higher counts indicate working-class demographics.

Traffic (AADT)

Annual Average Daily Traffic on nearby roads. Higher traffic = better visibility and walk-in potential.